Category: The Right to Life, Pro-Life Essays; Title: Against Abortion
The issue of abortion is one of the most commonly used as a topic for academic argumentative papers. Definitely, abortion is a very sensitive issue from the moral and ethical points of view, and there are numerous proponents and opponents of abortions in the US. Writing an academic paper on abortion can give the writer a great field for arguing and discussing numerous pros and cons of this controversial issue. At the same time, writing argumentative essay on abortion can help author formulate own point of view on this problem and demonstrate own opinion and position regarding abortion legalization.
Now let me say that I think abortion should not be a first resort standardform of birth control. There are better and more humane birth control methodsthat do not require unreasonable effort to use. That is, I do not thinkit is right for a person to whom pregnancy is unacceptable to have intercoursewithout using some reasonably effective form of birth control simply withthe idea that she (or, if a male, his partner) will get an abortion ifpregnancy occurs. Unless abortion were to become both psychologically andphysically less painful and difficult than it now is, most women are notlikely to do this more than once anyway, but even now I would think itbetter to spare any woman or couple this trauma, and any embryo this kindof end, even one unnecessary time.
I believe if someone has a legitimate argument that causing a childto be born into a certain kind of life would be far worse for the childthan not allowing it be born at all, then it would be wrong for societyor someone else to make that child be born while doing nothing to try tohelp that child have a worthwhile life. And this is particularly true ifit is well within society's or that person's power to help the child havea worthwhile life. I think it is wrong to force someone to have a childthat cannot be properly nurtured without help, help that one then intentionallywithholds. It seems more rational, more right, and more compassionate tohelp a person prevail over the legitimate objections he/she has againsthaving his/her innocent child be born, if one wants her/him to have a child,than to require her/him to have the child that you then essentially consignto a life of needless suffering.
Argumentative essay on pros and cons of abortion ..
Moreover, attempts to weigh goods so as to determine the “greatest” good inevitably turn into rationalization. If there is no truly greatest good, then the claim that one has found one is no more than a rhetorical cover for expressing one’s preferences. Think of abortion. Coming from a consequentialist framework, many say that preventing the suffering of an unready mother, or even an unloved child, is the greater good which may or must be promoted by killing that child.
Abortion - The pro-life argument. - GCSE Religious …
I once ventured upon some adolescent boys getting ready to torture ayoung cat by throwing it into a mass of sticker bushes to see how it woulddo. I interceded on behalf of the cat. The main antagonist, a fairly largeboy, was displeased by my intervention and said that I had no businessinterfering with their fun. His main comment was that it was his cat andhe could do anything he wanted to it. I take it that this is a form ofthe privacy (and private property) argument, that this was a private matterand I had no right to intervene. I did not at the time see fit to arguethe merits of the case on that particular issue and instead gave him othergrounds which I thought might appeal to him. I suggested that if he couldnot see any reason to see the similarity between the cat's feelings andhis own that I might help him see the relationship in this instance betweenthe cat's well-being and his own. This convinced him for the time at leastthat harming the cat might not be in his own best interest. But it occurredto me later that the cat's being his cat gave him not less responsibilityfor its well-being, as he seemed to think, but gave him even more responsibilityfor its well-being. In general, the owners of pets and the parents of youngchildren are held responsible for at least certain minimal standards oftheir charges' welfare. Recently enacted laws in a number of states requiringparents to have their children in car restraints while the car is in motionis another example of balancing parental privacy with child welfare onthe side of the welfare rather than privacy. And it does seem to me, havingseen so many parents who dangerously, carelessly, and recklessly allowtheir children to ride standing up on the front seat (as if to give theirheads better aim at the windshields in case of sudden braking or frontalcollision) that the innocent child should have a champion in the stateif the parents do not fulfill reasonable obligations. In general, a womandoes have some responsibility toward her children and even toward her unbornfetus. How much is open to discussion. And in general parents cannot justifablytreat their children any way they would want to, especially if that meansharming or killing the child, or risking its life or health needlessly.I would expect there to be made similar cases for fetal rights, thoughjust how much, and whether it could preclude abortion or not, and underwhat circumstances, is what is at issue. The point here is that privacy,by itself, is insufficient to morally justify abortion and/or other sortsof fetal harm -- regardless of the Supreme Court's legal decision.
Abortion - The pro-life argument
4) On the issue of trying to decide whether thefetus has a soul or when, or whether it is alive, or a live human beingor when, or whether killing a fetus is murder or not, and if so, when:
this is a question that either is more difficult than the questionof the rightness of abortion, or is impossible to answer because therecan be no answer other than simply one by fiat. It is impossible to discoverwhether a fetus is alive or is a human being or can be murdered becausethere is nothing to discover about either life or fetuses (or fertilizedeggs) that can count for or against whether they coincide or not. We alreadyknow to a great extent in what ways fetuses are like born people and inwhat ways they are different. The question is whether the similaritiesor differences are more relevant. That cannot be answered because the conceptof "alive" and "human being" have never before been either readily appliedto, nor kept from applying to, fetuses in the past and because there arenot clear cut enough definitions already for us to be able to tell whetherthey should apply or not.